Thursday, January 21, 2016

Preserving the Legacy of the ICTR (International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda) by Claire Germain: report on visit to the ICTR in June 2009

The following can be found at
https://www.library.cornell.edu/staffweb/kaleidoscope/april2010/April2010.htm
or
https://cornell.app.box.com/s/gdcqgmqvyhtf3t0bl6ydduogmb5uv4aj/1/11562487244/96996086298/1

(scroll down the linked page above and you will find what you see below)

See archive at http://ictr-archive09.library.cornell.edu/

Preserving the Legacy of the ICTR

Claire Germain
Three of us from Cornell University Library found ourselves in Arusha, Tanzania for a week in June 2009 as United Nations consultants at the invitation of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR).  Together with my colleagues Thomas Mills, research attorney and head of collections at Law, and Stuart Basefsky, information specialist at Catherwood and director of the IWS News Bureau of the Institute for Workplace Studies, I had been invited to provide advice and assistance in helping to preserve the heritage of the Tribunal which was scheduled to close in 2010.  We had also been asked to find ways to help raise the profile of the Tribunal in order to sustain its legacy and to explore areas of mutual interest.

Our visit to Tanzania reverberated at the highest level at Cornell, as President  Skorton is co-chair, with Professor Silas Lwakabamba from the National University of Rwanda, of a new advisory board for the Africa-U.S. Higher Education Initiative.  Sir Dennis Byron, the President of the ICTR, extended an invitation to President Skorton to visit the tribunal while we were there.  Although his schedule would not permit it, President Skorton expressed appreciation and interest in our work, noting the importance of our work with the ICTR and asking to be kept informed of our progress.  Our visit was also undertaken with the assistance of Professor Muna Ndula, Professor of Law and Director of the Cornell Institute for African Development, who had met some of the key players. 

From left: Chief of Information and Evidence Ayodeji Fadugba, Thomas Mills, Stuart Basefsky, ICTR President Sir Dennis Bryon, Claire Germain
While consulting for the ICTR in Tanzania we were able to make short trips to other important organizations including the East African Court of Justice, the African Foundation for International Law, and the East Africa Law Society.  They were very interested in hearing about our work for the ICTR and we were equally interested in the work they were engaged in.
At the Tribunal we learned about the different facets of their work and explained what kinds of things were being done at Cornell.  We talked about our experience with the Nuremberg trial transcripts and other materials.  It was on the basis of that very experience with the Donovan archive of Nuremberg materials that we had been invited to the ICTR.  That and our Liberia collection were of particular importance and relevance to the task at hand.

The Donovan Nuremberg Collection
Our acquisition of the Donovan Nuremberg Collection came about by a most fortuitous but entirely serendipitous circumstance.  General Donovan was the Assistant to the Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg, Justice Jackson.  After the trials were completed, General Donovan took the papers and had them bound into approximately 150 volumes.  They sat on the shelves in his law office at Donovan & Leisure for many years and were still there long after his death in 1959.  A young lawyer discovered them when the law firm dissolved in the 1990s and gave them to Henry Korn, a Cornell graduate who together with his wife offered them to the Law Library.

The Donovan Nuremberg Collection of trial transcripts and other materials which were declassified in the 1990s had not been seen for over 50 years.  We were delighted to accept the collection and began by creating a detailed index to the materials.  We digitized part of the collection and posted it and the index on the Internet.  Nearly overnight we were receiving requests from scholars all over the world for more information about the collection and appointments to visit.  The Rwanda Tribunal saw our Nuremberg collection online and picked up the phone to call me.  Several months later we found ourselves in Tanzania advising on the preservation of the papers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. (Above, Mount Meru, the tenth highest mountain in Africa)

From left: Thomas Mills, Chief of Evidence Ayodeji Fadugba, Senior Legal Officer Roland Adjovi, Judge Bossa, Claire Germain
Liberian Law Collection
From the mid 1950s to 1979 the Liberian Codification Project was led by Cornell professor Milton Konvitz, Professor at Law and ILR.  For over two decades Professor Konvitz collected documents in Liberia and brought them back to Cornell.  Later Law Librarian Jane Hammond visited Liberia in the 1980s to assist with the organization of their National Law Library.  Among the documents in the Konvitz archive at Cornell are early constitutions, a complete history of Liberia’s statutory law, and both working papers and final drafts of the codification project. 

After the destruction of virtually all legal materials during the Liberian civil war, the Konvitz archive assumed even greater importance as the unique repository of the statutory history of Liberia.  In recent years the Law Library has been working on the important and urgent goal to re-establish the rule of law in Liberia with various groups including the United Nations Mission in Liberia, the office of the U.S. State Department in Monrovia, and the Carter Center at Emory University.  See the February 2007 issue of Kaleidoscope for more about our Liberian Law Collection.

The ICTR in Tanzania
Our five days at the ICTR were long and filled with meetings, presentations, and excursions to neighboring groups and offices.  We were able to provide specific information on the following topics:
Our Donovan Nuremberg Collection and the Liberia/Konvitz Collection, what we have in these archives and how they are organized, what’s online;
Foundations and organizations with a reputation for funding preservation initiatives and especially for funding projects in Africa;
Internet resources for legal research;
How to organize online resources, how we organize our Web site at Cornell Law Library;
The variety of legal research training that can be offered to ICTR staff and their affiliates;
How to organize an archive; comparison of materials from the Office of the Prosecutor with our Liberia/Konvitz archive;
How to analyze data on Web site usage using methods employed at Cornell Law Library to analyze our homepage usage;
Free online legal resources in general and Web portals;
Large-scale digitization at Cornell, what has been done and what we have learned.

Throughout our visit we were struck by the urgency of the transition prompted by the closing of the Tribunal and the great need to keep genocide information centers available not only in Rwanda but throughout Africa.  Archives and the personal papers of judges were of paramount importance. 

The ICTR building above; and standing in front of the ICTR building, from left: Stuart Basefsky, Law School intern, Claire Germain, Chief Librarian Angeline Djampou, Chief of Evidence Ayodeji Fadugba, Thomas Mills
We met with the President of the ICTR, Sir Dennis Byron; Prosecutor Hassan Bubacar Jallow; staff of the Office of the Prosecutor; Head of the Judicial and Legal Services Division Pascal Besnier; staff of the Defence Counsel and Detention Management Section; members of the Witnesses and Victims Support Section; Chief Librarian Angeline Djampou; Chief of Information and Evidence Ayodeji Fadugba; Senior Legal Officer Roland Adjovi; and still others.  We visited the Detention Center.

When we met with President Byron he asked us both to help identify the judges’ needs and to assist in conceptualizing the usefulness of an archive of their papers.  Stuart explained how the library where the archive is located is responsible for its long term care but stressed to them that the control of the archives rests with the giver.  Based on his experience at ILR he was able to advise on how to organize their papers and to provide model forms and contracts. 

Outcomes and Future Steps
The profile of the Tribunal has already been raised since that trip to Tanzania last June.  President Byron was invited to speak at the Cornell Club in NYC in October 2009 by the Law School and ILR, coordinated and organized by Professor Samuel Bacharach, and he was invited by the Avon Global Center for Women and Justice to speak at their spring symposium in Washington, D.C. last month (March 2010).  Chief of the ICTR Information and Evidence Section Ayodeji Fadugba will speak at the upcoming American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) annual meeting in Denver, Colorado in July 2010 and at the upcoming International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) annual meeting in Goteborg, Sweden in August of this year.  These meetings alone have extended the audience of the work of the Tribunal to scholars and stakeholders worldwide. 
Stuart Basefsky arranged for the communications division of the ICTR to provide him with press releases for dissemination through his electronic news service, IWS Documented Newsand through two others services: ResourceShelf.comandDocuTicker.com.  We also discussed the possibility of archiving the ICTR Web site if permission were granted.

Sixty-five years after the end of World War II there has been a resurgence of interest in Holocaust studies.  Going online with our Donovan Nuremberg Collection has taken us in directions we could not have foreseen when we first received the archive.  It led to our collaboration with the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and it has recently been used by a Rochester lawyer in preparing a case from Guantanamo Bay.  Our Donovan collection will be the subject of an upcoming Cybertower video that will be available by Reunion time in June.  Who knows where the legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda will reside 50 years from now.

Masai mother and child
Claire Germain is Edward Cornell Law Librarian and Director of the Law Library, Professor of Law, and Director of the Dual Degree Programs Paris & Berlin.
Photographs provided by Claire Germain

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Presentation on AUTHENTICATION OF DIGITAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION: WHY DOES IT MATTER? found on pages 119 to 133 of FALL FEDERAL DEPOSITORY LIBRARY COUNCIL MEETING AND CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPTS, ARLINGTON, VA | OCTOBER 18 - 20, 2010

Presentation on AUTHENTICATION OF DIGITAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION: WHY DOES IT MATTER? found on pages 119 to 133 of
FALL FEDERAL DEPOSITORY LIBRARY COUNCIL MEETING AND CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPTS, ARLINGTON, VA | OCTOBER 18 - 20, 2010
http://www.fdlp.gov/file-repository/outreach/events/depository-library-council-dlc-meetings/meeting-minutes-and-transcripts/1796-transcripts-from-the-fall-2010-dlc-meeting/file

The slides referred to are found here:
Authentication of Digital Government Information--Why Does it Matter? by Stuart Basefsky
http://www.fdlp.gov/file-repository/outreach/events/depository-library-council-dlc-meetings/2010-meeting-proceedings/fall-dlc-meeting-arlington-va-1/1775-authentication-of-digital-government-information-why-does-it-matter?path=outreach/events/depository-library-council-dlc-meetings/2010-meeting-proceedings/fall-dlc-meeting-arlington-va-1

Note: other comments and discussions by Stuart Basefsky are found throughout this conference document.

Excerpt (transcribed from a recording)


….Now, we'll move onto Stuart who will show different uses in other disciplines outside of law where authenticated information takes place in research.

MR. BASEFSKY: Okay. Actually, I was a little bit surprised that this topic was on the agenda here because back in 2001 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) -- at that time called the General Accounting Office, did a study on information management and electronic dissemination of government publications and it was largely settled policy that the government is obligated to authenticate. See--http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01428.pdf
 But people keep questioning the need for authentication so that's why I'm here, I suppose. I'm giving you the perspective from the social sciences. As you can see from my title, I'm the Senior Reference Librarian at the School of Industrial & Labor Relations. I'm also a lecturer and I'm also the Director of an Internet news service on workplace issues.

I talk fast, and if you have trouble following me, remember that you're listening too slowly. Note that there are all sorts of psychological studies that indicate that if one talks fast and that person wears glasses people think that they are intelligent. So, I hope I don't disappoint.

Okay. In any event, this is the perspective of the social sciences. Why invite me? I'm at a library, the Catherwood Library that is known as the world's largest university collection on workplace issues. We deal with all of the social sciences through the lens of the workplace. So, we deal with labor law, employment law, arbitration, labor economics, human resources, psychology and sociology of work. It goes on and on and on. Any of the social sciences, you name it. As long as it's related to the workplace in any way or another, we focus on that social science through that lens.

Now, as I make my presentation today, be aware that this is from my perspective a very, very serious issue. I'm going to define what I'm talking about. I'm going to give some specific examples and I'm going to relate the significance. Like I say, this is a serious matter. How serious is it? Well, one of the things that we forget about is the U.S. Government issues currency. That is a government document. Don't forget it. And it's insured if it's deposited in a federally insured bank by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Now, that is the print version of the dollar. When it goes into your bank you have the digital version of the dollar. It doesn't look like the print version but the value is retained. The content essentially is retained. All the things that it was intended to have are there. When you go there you don't want to come out of the bank with bogus $100 bills. And you don't want to be sending stuff with your credit card realizing that it's really not working because it's not accepted. You'll notice that there is a U.S. code provision here, regulations governing insured depository institutions that actually requires the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government to be behind that particular publication.

The Government Printing Office actually produces what I call the intellectual currency of the government. Yes, the intellectual currency. And deposits should be backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Now there may not be a specific law requiring that but I'm going to go through a demonstration process here indicating for all intents and purposes the U.S. Government intends for the Government Printing Office to authenticate and why. And before I get into that, I have two quotes at the bottom of this particular slide that I think resonate with all of us. One is attributed to Daniel Patrick Moynihan speaking in terms of the U.S and free speech. “We're always told, you are entitled to your opinion. We're hearing lots of opinions today in politics. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” So, how do we determine what is a fact? And if we can determine through authentication that it is, in fact, the fact, what do we do with that? Well, then you have Mark Twain who takes a kind of humorous perspective on this and says “you first get the facts, you can distort them later.”

So, if we look at the National Archives right now you can see that there is a provision in there for the electronic records management guidance on methodology for determining agency unique requirements. And I give you a link to that particular publication on the net and as you go down a few paragraphs you're going to come upon what they give as the definition that they take from the International Council on Archives, the Guide For Managing Electronic Records From An Archival Perspective. But what we're concerned about here is the reliability of a record and its ability to serve as reliable evidence.

Authenticity refers to the persistence over time of the original characteristics of the record with respect to the context, structure and content. An authentic record is one that retains its original reliability. Now, after hearing this, you're going to say the federal depository system should put all the federal depository documents in with manuscripts and archives. Manuscripts and archives now in the electronic world have to be current. We don't wait 100 years for something to show up there. You wait maybe 100 days. Because in the electronic environment, everything is disposable and removed on quick notice. And an aside [for librarians] you'll get more respect because of if you work with the manuscripts department, you will get all the money in the world.

 Okay. Now, in talking about this you have to know that you're dealing here with the general concept of a chain of reliability. Now, here comes the specific example. In the Census when you look at how Census publications are produced, they actually refer you to the Office of Management and Budget. And in the Office of Management and Budget there is a thing called the Standards and Guidelines for Statistical Surveys. The link is there. The first paragraph states: "Statistics collected and published by the Federal Government constitutes a significant portion of the available information about the United States economy, population, natural resources, environment, public and private institutions." These data are used by the Federal Government and others as a basis for actions that affect people's lives and wellbeing. It is essential that they be collected, processed and published in a manner that guarantees and inspires confidence in their reliability. Now, when we look at that chain, there's a lot that goes on. If you read into this document, how do you collect? Well, you collect in a lot of different ways. In my school, one of the things you're concerned about is the BLS Handbook of Methods. Statisticians, academics go to a great deal of trouble to make certain that the right processes are gone through. They collect the data based on those processes, then they process the data. What's comparable, what's not comparable, what are the variables? Then it has to be published. And if the publication is not authentic, that chain of reliability is broken. You do not want to be in the position of offering a document where you've broken the chain of reliability.

Now, that chain of reliability follows on to the government, and particularly GPO's very concerned about it. But academic libraries should be concerned about the documents that their scholars are looking at. Even in the print world, we have trouble. A lot of us rely on third party publishers like CIS, Congressional Information Service. I worked with them for years. I admire their work. I've actually helped them develop some of their publications and projects. However, I've told them on many occasions as a government documents librarian, which I was a number of years ago, we used to receive corrections to hearings, to committee prints, to statistical publications. They don't put any of those corrections in there. The academy is relying on those publications. It's just too expensive to fit into their workflow to add in the corrections. So, some people are doing their scholarly work based on information that may not actually be correct. So, that's a problem in the print world. Can you imagine what that problem is now in the electronic world? Anyway, we do not want to break that chain of reliability.

Now, one of the things that concerned me because of where I work I actually collect government documents and we put them into our institutional repository and we don't use institutional repository in a standard way. We have the IR at our particular school. It's separate from Cornell's. We have over 13,000 materials in there, more than all of Cornell University together in our separate little school repository. We have 70 percent compliance with our faculty in doing it. But we also do a lot of other things. We work with the Department of Labor. We collect collective bargaining agreements that cover a thousand workers or more from the Department of Labor. They rely on us to put that out there. These things re not authenticated. I wish they were. We're doing the best we can. We're collecting what is available. The reliability of these things are in question to some extent. And when you're dealing with union busters out there, they would love to change what some clauses might have been or should have been or whatever in various kinds of collective bargaining agreements. I also collect key workplace documents, anything dealing with the workplace. I'm upset that I collect Congressional Research Service materials from third parties because I can't get it from the original government office. Has it been modified since I collected it? A question that academic librarians should be asking is where are you getting your documents on the Internet? Are you getting it from the original source? Are you getting it through a third parties? I mean if you're not documenting that, what is it that you're handing to your faculty and to the world out there? We know that Google does a sloppy job. What version are they providing? All those things are really key.

Now, I do another thing. I run an Internet news service where I actually distribute links. I don't ever distribute documents. But links to the official authentic publications of the U.S. Government. But my audience is largely Europe. The institutions I serve are relying on this service. The International Labour Organization, the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions use the material for comparative public policy purposes and data to do research and study and make certain that what we say that we're doing in the United States is reliable information. The U.S. Government doesn't distribute the information. There's a lot of political reasons for that. I don't have time to go into it. But I distribute it on their behalf. And I would like to know that these things are authenticated. Very often they are not. And people are relying on it and it makes me nervous. 

Now, when you talk about the scholarly method, what is the scholarship?  It's the body of principles and practices used by scholars to make their claims about the world as valid and as trustworthy as possible and to make them known to the scholarly public. Citation is a very important part of that. The purpose is to identify, distinguish and locate documentation material relied upon in producing studies. This is done so that others may validate the findings and methods used. Original source documentation is preferred, often produced by the government. Don't forget that GPO is original source documentation. It is more valued than the general collections. Academic librarians, public librarians, they need to know that the government documents are original source documentation. They are as valued as your rare books and your manuscripts and they should be given the same deference. Important elements of a citation in online environment. Well, we know that we have a problem with citation. Everybody in the world of scholars, we talked about scholarship and we talked about scholarship light. The cut and paste scholars. Oh, I found this on the Internet. URL. This goes in my paper. Anybody checking it, you go to their working papers, oh, that disappeared. Where is it? Oh, I got to go look for the title for someone. Did I find it from the source that you found it from? I don't know. Where did you find this doggone thing? The title may be the same. The content may be different. Who knows. But the purpose, again, of a citation is to verify the specific authentic reliable sources used so that others may replicate the findings.


In the world of the Internet without that authentication, it's a mess. So, what we have are issues of governance, trust, reliance, confidence. In brief, the role of government is at stake as well as the reputations of scholars and scholarship itself. Now, there are different perspectives that you can take on this. Another one would be, most of the States of the United States have rules against tampering with government records. Have you ever heard of the legal notion of an attractive nuisance like a swimming pool without a fence around it so kids can go in there and drown? Well, if you have laws on the books that make it illegal to tamper with government records, I mean, you create government records that are easily tampered with, you're created an attractive nuisance and we are drowning in that instability. So, anyway, that's enough. Okay.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Trainer and Advisor with BACHARACH LEADERSHIP GROUP(BLG)

BACHARACH LEADERSHIP GROUP (BLG)--Who We Are
http://blg-lead.com/who-we-are-2/

Drawing on years of experience, BLG trainers and advisors ensure each training program is customized and industry specific. BLG works closely with leading academics and practitioners across a wide variety of industries to build programs that give leaders proven skills that deliver immediate business impact.

Among the list of trainers and advisors is found:


STUART M. BASEFSKY

Information and Technology Specialist

Stuart M. Basefsky is a renowned information specialist and lecturer/trainer who focuses on gathering and customizing essential facts and research in support of leadership, public policy, work and business needs. Most notable is his work as Director of the IWS News Bureau of the Institute for Workplace Studies (IWS) in the New York City Office of the ILR School/Cornell University.

More

He is also an award winning teacher who developed a unique course entitled, “HR Online Research and Reporting Methods for Executive Decision-making” in collaboration with the Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. He consults on these matters with the European Union and other international intergovernmental organizations as well as with leading business schools such as ESCP Europe and the University College Dublin School of Business. His career has been primarily at Duke University and Cornell University where he continues to work. Basefsky holds a bachelor’s degree in international affairs from the University of Colorado at Boulder, a master’s degree in international studies and education from Duke University, and a master’s degree in information and library science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He also has two years of legal training at the University of Colorado Law School.

Member of the Editorial Team (Scientific Directors) of E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies


E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies
http://adapt.it/EJCLS/index.php/ejcls_adapt/about/editorialTeam

Editorial Team

Scientific Directors

  1. Lauren Appelbaum, University of California, United States
  2. Greg Bamber, Monash University, Australia
  3. Stuart M Basefsky, Institute for Workplace Studies, ILR School, Cornell University, United States
  4. Daria V. Chernyaeva, National Reasearch University - Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation
  5. Richard Croucher, Middlesex University, United Kingdom
  6. Maurizio del Conte, Bocconi University, Italy
  7. Tomas Davulis, Vilnius University, Lithuania
  8. Tayo Fashoyin, University of Lagos, Nigeria
  9. József Hajdu, Szeged University, Hungary
  10. Ms. Ann C Hodges, University of Richmond School of Law, United States
  11. Richard Hyman, LSE, United Kingdom
  12. Maarten Keune, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
  13. Christopher Leggett, University of South Australia & James Cook University, Australia
  14. Guglielmo Meardi, Warwick Business School, United Kingdom
  15. Shinya Ouchi, Kobe University, Japan
  16. Massimo Pilati, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
  17. Valeria Pulignano, Katholieke Universitiet Leuven, Belgium
  18. Michael Quinlan, University of New South Wales, Australia
  19. Juan Raso Delgue, Universidad de la República de Uruguay, Uruguay
  20. Raúl G. Saco Barrios, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru
  21. Alfredo Sánchez Castañeda, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
  22. Malcolm Sargeant, Middlesex University, United Kingdom
  23. Jean Michel Servais, University of Gerona (Spain) and Liège (Belgium). International Society for Labour Law and Social Security, Switzerland
  24. Silvia Spattini, ADAPT-CSMB, Italy
  25. Michele Tiraboschi, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italy
  26. Anil Verma, University of Toronto, Canada
  27. Stephen A. Woodbury, Upjohn Institute, United States

Joint Managing Editors

  1. Malcolm Sargeant, Middlesex University, United Kingdom
  2. Michele Tiraboschi, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italy

Editorial Board

  1. Lilli Casano, Italy
  2. Valentina Franca, Slovenia
  3. Dr Erica Howard, Middlesex University, United Kingdom
  4. Karl Koch, United Kingdom
  5. Lefteris Kretsos, United Kingdom
  6. Attila Kun, Hungary
  7. Felicity Lamm, New Zealand
  8. Cristina Lincaru, Romania
  9. Nikita Lyutov, Russian Federation
  10. Merle Muda, Lithuania
  11. Boaz Munga, Kenya
  12. John Opute, United Kingdom
  13. Eleonora Peliza, Argentina
  14. Daiva Petrylaite, Lithuania
  15. Ceciel Rayer, Netherlands
  16. Aidan Regan, Ireland
  17. Marian Rizov, United Kingdom
  18. Salma Slama, Tunisia
  19. Araya Mesele, Ethiopia
  20. Barbara Winkler, Austria
  21. Machilu Zimba, South Africa

Language Editor

  1. Pietro Manzella, ADAPT Senior Research Fellow, Italy

Book Review Editor

  1. Christopher Leggett, University of South Australia & James Cook University, Australia

Industrial Relations Overview of the U.S. [2004, revised Nov. 2006] prepared for Industrial Relations in the EU, Japan, and USA (Sweeney and Basefsky) European Industrial Relations Observatory (EIRO) seminar 18-19 October 2004 in Dublin, Ireland

The following was produced for the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions in preparation for a Seminar on
Industrial Relations in the EU, Japan, and USA (Sweeney and Basefsky)
European Industrial Relations Observatory (EIRO) seminar 18-19 October 2004 in Dublin, Ireland

This guide was used widely at the ILR School and around the globe for a few years while it was still current.

Industrial Relations Overview of the U.S. [2004, revised 11 Nov. 2006]
https://web.archive.org/web/20070614003722/http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/library/research/subjectGuides/industrialRelationsOverview.html

An alternative location is available from SSRN at:
Industrial Relations Overview of the United States
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2719765

This guide is intended to provide key links for a quick overview of issues, data, and developments in U.S. industrial relations. It is produced in cooperation with the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions as an aid to research in international and comparative studies. The resources listed are chosen because they are primarily free and authoritative. Other resources may be found by using the Research section of the Catherwood Library web site. The listing of sources is not comprehensive. It is simply a useful place to start.

[Please Note: BNA, Inc. produces the most often used reports analyzing collective bargaining and industrial relations developments in the United States. Among these reports are the Daily Labor Report and Negotiated Settlements Report, both of which are commercially produced and available in numerous libraries including this one. However, links to these items are not provided since access is restricted to locations paying for these services].
Further revised and updated by Stuart Basefsky, 11 November 2006

Includes the following topics.

Monday, January 18, 2016

Social Dialogue and Recession in the Banking Sector (Arthur Wheaton and Stuart Basefsky) held 24,25 November 2010 in Rome, Italy

European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
Recession and Social Dialogue in the Banking Sector: A Global Prespective [2011]
http://www.praxis.ee/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2010-Recession-and-social-dialogue-in-the-banking-sector.pdf
Citing:
 Wheaton, A. and Basefsky, S., Social dialogue and recession in the banking sector in the US, Dublin, Eurofound, 2011.
(Based on their participation in a Eurofound Workshop entitled: Social Dialogue and Recession in the Banking Sector held 24,25 November 2010 in Rome, Italy)

Studies on the EU and Other Global Economies: The Role of Social Partners in Tackling the Crisis (Arthur Wheaton and Stuart Basefsky), 30 November, 1 December 2011 in Dublin, Ireland

Scroll down to item.


























Go to following link for the original
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/events/other/studies-on-the-eu-and-other-global-economies-the-role-of-social-partners-in-tackling-the-crisis-0

Studies on the EU and other Global Economies: the role of social partners in tackling the crisis


Conference on the role of social partners in tackling the crisis, 30 November - 1 December 2011, Dublin, Ireland

Venue: Raymond-Pierre Bodin Conference Centre, Eurofound, Wyattville Road, Dublin, Ireland

Presentations - Day 1:

Presentations - Day 2: